PERSPECTIVE ON PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT: APPRAISAL OF ARTIFICIAL AVOIDANCE OF PERMANENT ESTABLISHMENT STATUS UNDER THE ETHIOPIAN INCOME TAX SYSTEM

Main Article Content

Alemu Balcha Adugna

Abstract

The allocation of taxing rights between states concerning business profits of Multinational
Enterprises (MNEs) is a very complex activity. The central notion of the allocation rules is
that the host state is competent to impose an income tax on the profits of non-resident
enterprises if and only if the concerned enterprises have the Permanent Establishment (PE).
However, owing to the gaps in the definition of PE as envisaged under bilateral double
taxation agreements and national tax laws, the artificial avoidance of PE status has become
an international agenda. In response to this, the OECD and G-20 countries have adopted 15
points action plans to address Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) and Action Plan 7
has laid out a path to prevent the artificial avoidance of PE status. Coming to Ethiopia, the
way the definition of PE is articulated has room for MNEs to artificially avoid PE status,
which results in the loss of revenue for the government. The aim of this article is to examine
the room for artificial avoidance of PE status under the Ethiopian income tax system and
explores opportunities for further regulation. To this end, it employed doctrinal research
methodology to investigate the pertinent provisions of the Income Tax law and double
taxation agreements. Accordingly, the paper's finding shows that Ethiopian income tax law
has not adequately tackled artificial avoidance of PE status through commissionaire
arrangement and splitting up of the contract. Concerning double taxation agreements of
Ethiopia, saving for artificial avoidance of PE status through the independent agent that
incidentally tackled, no countermeasures has taken against artificial avoidance of PE status
through specific activity exemption, splitting up of the contract, and dependent agency
commissionaire arrangement. Hence, it is recommended for Ethiopia to integrate
countermeasures for artificial avoidance of PE status into domestic law and double taxation
agreements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles